Avro Lancaster

30 Dec 2011 15:47 #51 by sumter
Replied by sumter on topic Avro Lancaster

156 was based at Warboys when it received Lancs. It moved to Upwood in Mar. 44., then Wyton in Jun 45.
The first clip shown above is particularly interesting as it shows Mk11 Lancs. [Hercules radial engines]


Papajuliet - Thanks for pointing out that Mk IIs are featured in that first clip: I'd missed the engines. No 426 Sqn, apparently; and presumably at Linton-on-Ouse in 1943. Now that must be the rarest of the rare!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Dec 2011 21:10 #52 by Linton Lad
Replied by Linton Lad on topic Avro Lancaster
yeah the first clip is linton on ouse. flying in on the 10 runway as its the bomb dump rite in front as the plane lands

Many thanks from linton lad

come join my facebook group/ raf linton on ouse spotters group

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Jan 2013 14:31 #53 by hydealfred
Replied by hydealfred on topic Avro Lancaster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Jan 2013 14:46 #54 by Bradlad
Replied by Bradlad on topic Avro Lancaster
Good, there are plenty of static Lanc's around the country but only 1 where they belong, in the air.

I'm a supporter of NX611 and visit regularly, I can't wait to see her in the air.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Jan 2013 15:35 #55 by Ossington_2008
Replied by Ossington_2008 on topic Avro Lancaster
I'd like to see her fly, but if she does, I'll bet you won't get the current access to her as you can now (taxi runs, interior photography etc.) she will infringe some CAA or H&S rule that will keep the public well away.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Jan 2013 18:59 #56 by Bomber
Replied by Bomber on topic Avro Lancaster
Waching the BBC news to night they interviewed Fred Pntten & it seems to have NX611 flying again has been on the agenda since they bought her back in the Eighties . I think to see two Lancasters flying in the UK would be a tromenouse tribute to BOMBER COMMAND & all the People who served in the RAF .

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Jan 2013 19:34 #57 by bigmal
Replied by bigmal on topic Avro Lancaster
Nothing bad at all about another Lancaster in the air.

Good on `em, I say.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Jan 2013 22:28 #58 by Bigbear
Replied by Bigbear on topic Avro Lancaster
This has always been on the cards, but the brothers never seem to have come out fully with their intentions, only merely hinting at the possibility. I personally think it is awesome news, however you are right, the CAA might scupper the access to taxi runs and flights, although clambering around the inside should be OK. I've been on Sally B a couple of times.

Now what would be good is if they can offer flights like the Canadian Lanc. The way they get around it is that you officially sign up as part of the crew therefore you are not a passenger. Now that would be something!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Jan 2013 23:06 #59 by Ossington_2008
Replied by Ossington_2008 on topic Avro Lancaster
Didn't they run a Catalina club like that once? For a coupla hundred quid annual membership, you had at one flight guaranteed PA, could even include practice water landings to add to your PPL log book ISTR. Got to be better than seeing a Red Bull Lancaster (shudder.)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Jan 2013 00:03 #60 by Bigbear
Replied by Bigbear on topic Avro Lancaster
The pantons won't do that (the red bull thing that is). That's why it's taken so long to get to this. If I remember rightly they wouldn't accept external funding unless it was a pure gift. The pantons are too true to the cause as it is in memory of their brother which is why they have such an amazing memorial at east Kirkby. It doesn't get better than a living bomber airfield if only one corner of one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.068 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information