Unknown Aircraft Pod

15 Nov 2016 21:23 #11 by ianbache
Replied by ianbache on topic Unknown Aircraft Pod
Canberra looks very likely, the lights on the end of the wing look the same on the below image

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.



Regards Ian

Llanbedr History not to be forgotten!!!!!!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2016 22:05 #12 by WJT
Replied by WJT on topic Unknown Aircraft Pod
Yes, that's it. I wonder if the pod, which seems to have been mounted further outboard than the pylon, was used to film stores release from the pylon.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2016 23:35 - 15 Nov 2016 23:37 #13 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic Unknown Aircraft Pod
The photo was taken by the engineering instrument department at Hatfield. There is no date. I always thought it was to do with engine testing but maybe the propeller company and guided missiles WH735 (Blue Jay / Firestreak) for example.

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2016 23:49 #14 by Dietmar Morley
Replied by Dietmar Morley on topic Unknown Aircraft Pod

The photo was taken by the engineering instrument department at Hatfield. There is no date. I always thought it was to do with engine testing but maybe the propeller company and guided missiles WH735 (Blue Jay / Firestreak) for example.


If you mean WH735 is the tail number (which was a Canberra) then that is consistent with the lettering you can just see in your first picture and in fact the second picture.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2016 23:54 #15 by PJH
Replied by PJH on topic Unknown Aircraft Pod
The reg seems to be in the WJ7xx series, which were all early Mk.2/4/6/7 Canberras. It also natural metal finish, again most common on the early Canberras.

I'd definitely agree on an inward-facing camera pod, so what was it looking at? I'd also guess a missile, but t'internet doesn't throw anything up.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Paul Francis

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Nov 2016 18:30 #16 by ianbache
Replied by ianbache on topic Unknown Aircraft Pod
This from ADF Serials.

WJ978 B.2 Built by Avro 17/07/53 (one of 75 built by A.V.Roe & Co at Woodford).
Delivered to RAF as WJ978.
To De Havilland Propellers Hatfield for Blue Jay trials 29/03/56.
Delivered to RAAF 14/05/57 at Edinburgh SA.
To 12JSTU at WRE 30/05/57.
Re-allocated to Red Top and Jindivik trials 30/12/59 .
Instrument checking and Blue Steel range safety aircraft 05/02/60.
Red Top trials 28/04/62.
This aircraft suffered a starboard engine flame out on 07/03/58 and was forced to make an emergency landing.
The RAAF status card shows a number of engine changes and modifications being carried out.
Struck off charge 31/07/62.
On 25/02/63 the aircraft was reduced to components.
Highlight for Album: Canberra WJ978

Might help.

Regards Ian

Llanbedr History not to be forgotten!!!!!!!
The following user(s) said Thank You: Paul Francis

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Nov 2016 21:23 - 24 Nov 2016 22:02 #17 by WJT
Replied by WJT on topic Unknown Aircraft Pod
Just been soaking up Hikoki's new 'Black Box Canberras' by David Forster. So far I've not found a picture showing that particular camera pod, but I think the aircraft is actually WH700. This Canberra was allocated to DH Propellers for Blue Jay [Firestreak] trials and with WJ978 it went to 12 JSTU.

EDIT: Forget all after good evening!

Found a pic in the new Hikoki:

The aircraft is WJ755 - a Canberra B6 used for Spectre rocket motor trials. There is a picture on page 81 of the new book.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Nov 2016 23:42 #18 by Dietmar Morley
Replied by Dietmar Morley on topic Unknown Aircraft Pod
Nice one! Great find.

I really enjoy these detective hunts!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.042 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information