Just awful. Tragic that it should have hit the main road. Another blow to the vintage aircraft scene. From what I could see on the video there was a loss of power during the recovery from the manoeuvre.
What I find surprising in the news coverage is the lack of focus on those who lost their lives on the ground. I took a while to realise that it was people in cars that had perished based on the news I got on my phone. As with all news items those seriously injured don't even get a mention, despite probably having life changing injuries.
No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)
Now I'm not local to the Shoreham area, but I thought it had just crashed into trees. A spectator told me that there were traffic lights under the flames and there was bound to be an increased death toll.
What I find surprising in the news coverage is the lack of focus on those who lost their lives on the ground. I took a while to realise that it was people in cars that had perished based on the news I got on my phone. As with all news items those seriously injured don't even get a mention, despite probably having life changing injuries.
I think it is because of the British authorities way of clamping down on information with nothing released on casualties. With the fireball, it could be some time before they are identified and the police will not release any names until after identification and families notified.
Sky News, with their usual record of accuracy, apparently initially reported it was a WWII jet fighter.
On the news this morning a presenter posed the question as to whether these old aircraft should be allowed to fly! No I suspect it wasn't his view but why ask such a stupid question in the first place? There are much more dangerous things that should be banned but never will.
No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)
On the news this morning a presenter posed the question as to whether these old aircraft should be allowed to fly! No I suspect it wasn't his view but why ask such a stupid question in the first place? There are much more dangerous things that should be banned but never will.
Probably because it is a question being asked by many people and in many newspapers. If he was interviewing an expert then it would give the give expert a chance to put his own point of view.
Sadly when a story like this breaks the media rush to report it but with little to go on, usually a few comments on social media. As the story develops they are reliant on what the emergency services release to them. In this case it seems even the emergency services are unsure as to how many victims are at the crash scene. For example, there are reports of a wedding limo being at the scene but the authorities uncertain as to how many were in it. Several media websites reported it was a WW2 plane that crashed. One even said it was a WW2 plane from 1951 (that reporter's history teacher must be sighing heavily). In our desire for 24 hour wall to wall news coverage we will often get ill-informed, poorly reported & edited speculation/news. Maybe as the earlier posts indicated the best reaction is to pause and pray for those caught up in or impacted by the tragedy. As an historian I would simply say things are not always what they first appear to be, give it time, let the dust settle, don't rush to judgements but then the news entertainment industry can't afford the luxury of time and informed consideration.
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.