Supermarine Spitfire

15 Dec 2011 12:41 #21 by WJT
Replied by WJT on topic Supermarine Spitfire
NFE = Night Flying Equipment. Basically, this was a navigation and instrument lighting installation, powered by a battery mounted in the front cockpit with the controls in the captain's cockpit (rear). NFE was available from the outset of the design, but Tiger Moth II modification Nos 66 and 67 in May and June 1940 made provision for its partial or complete removal. However, Tiger Moth II modification No 105 was approved in November 1941 to reintroduce NFE. In the context of an aircraft storage unit it would be important to know the configuration of a particular aircraft because it would be foolish to send a non-NFE Tiger to a training unit where night flying was a training requirement.

EIC is not a straightforward abbreviation, and I wonder if it was connected with the external camouflage scheme. Tiger Moth II modification No 62 introduced a 'new' camouflage scheme in April 1940, and this was updated by modification No 70 in June. A revised camouflage scheme and Service markings were introduced by modification No 77 in Novemeber 1940 and camouflage 'Scheme B' was deleted by modification No 93 in February 1941. It might have been important to know what external camouglage was applied to a particular aircraft because it might affect its suitability for different roles.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 14:10 #22 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic Supermarine Spitfire
Tiger Moth EIC (N6635) is one example c.1947

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Dec 2011 16:06 #23 by mawganmad
Replied by mawganmad on topic Supermarine Spitfire

NP's parallel thread on Key Historic has so far gleaned 40 replies and 1,600 hits, although I'm not sure if there was more heat than light.


My post was on topic, but no one seemed bothered about it!

James Thomas

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Apr 2012 08:49 #24 by hydealfred
Replied by hydealfred on topic Supermarine Spitfire

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Apr 2012 08:55 #25 by Bigbear

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Apr 2012 09:45 #26 by airfields man
Replied by airfields man on topic Supermarine Spitfire
You beat me to it hdf, I was sent a link to this story at 7.30am this morning, but didn't know how to do a copy onto here :roll: I think this is marvellous, whoever said that there is no such thing as buried WW2 aircraft :lol:

The Dead got memorials, The living got time.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Apr 2012 10:21 #27 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Supermarine Spitfire
Anybody seen them yet? It sounds too good to be true, at least as far as the condition of the airframes. Not sure about the crates though, ideal condition for rotting I would have thought.

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Apr 2012 10:52 #28 by daveg4otu
Replied by daveg4otu on topic Supermarine Spitfire
All they need to recover are 20 data(c/n) plates. Nowadays you jack up the plate and build a new aircraft underneath it and call it "restored".

Do I believe this?
I 'll withold judgement until the first aircraft sees the light of day.

See my Hampshire,Dorset,Devon,IOW Airfields sites..
www.hampshireairfields.co.uk/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Apr 2012 16:35 #29 by 100thbombgroup
Replied by 100thbombgroup on topic Supermarine Spitfire
Hope it's true and they find them.

news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16208535

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Apr 2012 17:42 #30 by Martin Bull
Replied by Martin Bull on topic Supermarine Spitfire
The cynicism and negativity shown here is most disappointing. Shame on you all ! :evil:

For myself, I treasure this clipping which I took from The Times, 7/3/1990 and have kept ever since, tucked into my copy of 'Action Stations #2' :-

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.



;-)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.066 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information