Airfield Identification please

30 Jan 2016 17:24 #1 by RichardWW
Airfield Identification please was created by RichardWW
With the past successes I have to keep the "lucky ball" rolling. At the start of the film The Hypnotist (1957) the central character, a test pilot, heads towards his plane. It is a Royal Navy Hawker Hunter. It has "701" on the nose but the aircraft marking, which is difficult to read appears to be WF 702. The fact that it is a Royal Navy plane will hopefully narrow the options, the initial clear shot of the background building and perhaps that there are at least two similar building as it takes off might help identify the airfield. As always, I am so impressed with all your knowledge, hopefully you can help me on this one as well.


This message has attachments images.
Please log in or register to see it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Jan 2016 17:39 #2 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic Airfield Identification please
They might be Ford in Sussex.

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Jan 2016 17:52 #3 by RichardWW
Replied by RichardWW on topic Airfield Identification please
Thanks Paul, there is certainly a distinct similarity to one of the buildings on Ford Airfield section, especially the roof lights if that is what they were/are. Was there a set War Dept. design or did they vary according to area?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Jan 2016 18:00 #4 by kebecker
Replied by kebecker on topic Airfield Identification please
I thinks it's a Sea Hawk rather than a Hunter

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Jan 2016 18:07 #5 by RichardWW
Replied by RichardWW on topic Airfield Identification please
Thanks, I knew it was dangerous for me to be specific amongst all you experts! I see on a forum elsewhere that Ford was used by the Fleet Air Arm so maybe it is.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Jan 2016 18:20 #6 by Dietmar Morley
Replied by Dietmar Morley on topic Airfield Identification please
That's' certainly a Sea Hawk, but it's tail number can't have been WF 702 as that would make it a meteor:

www.ukserials.com/results.php?serial=WF

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Jan 2016 18:37 - 30 Jan 2016 18:38 #7 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic Airfield Identification please
They are Ministry of Aircraft Production type B1 hangars of which Ford had two.

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Jan 2016 19:18 #8 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Airfield Identification please
WF is probably a station code as these were sometimes on the fins. It is more likely to be a land based unit thae a disembarked one.

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Jan 2016 19:53 #9 by Iain Taylor
Replied by Iain Taylor on topic Airfield Identification please

WF is probably a station code as these were sometimes on the fins. It is more likely to be a land based unit thae a disembarked one.


WF is part of the 'registration' not a station code. Haven't seen the film but the aircraft numbers don't match the registration...so the 701 worn on the nose (and tail) won't match the numeric part of the registration.

WF171 and WF174 were certainly based at RNAS Ford (I had a couple of airfix models of them back in the day).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Jan 2016 20:19 #10 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic Airfield Identification please
The three SDs in TNA state Ford as having:
1942 five Bellmans. one Belfast, plus blisters
1944 five Bellmans, one Gen Purpose, plus blisters
1955 four Bellmans, three B1, plus blisters

Seems some reconstruction took place postwar. including four substantial hardstandings (similar to the RAF's ASPs) which might feature in the above photo.

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.061 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information