Another mystery airfield to ID

03 Jun 2013 19:03 #1 by P Bellamy
Another mystery airfield to ID was created by P Bellamy
These two images came from a B-17 crewmember stationed at Deenethorpe and would have been taken sometime between January and mid-June 1944, but where on Earth is this particular airstrip?
Looks to be a landing T at the end of the runway, and an unusual three-digit heading painted on too.
I did think it may be one of the Emergency Landing Fields, but it doesn't seem to match up very well to any of them. Woodbridge approaching from the west perhaps?

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.



This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.



PB

Paul Bellamy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Jun 2013 20:02 #2 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Another mystery airfield to ID
The odd angle at the end does remind me of the Alland Grange end of Manston, approaching from the west. The 112 doesn't fit with any of these I would of thought.

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Jun 2013 20:25 #3 by P Bellamy
Replied by P Bellamy on topic Another mystery airfield to ID
Checking the mission logs for this particular aircraft, she did have a forced landing at Manston in early April 1944.
Coming in with only two of the four engines running, one of which had no working supercharger, one of the main wheels completely missing, the cockpit shot up by cannon shells and the bomb doors jammed open since the target (Schweinfurt that day). No further injuries were sustained by the crew in the landing, but the plane didn't fly again until June.

Paul Bellamy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Jun 2013 21:08 #4 by kebecker
Replied by kebecker on topic Another mystery airfield to ID
www.ead.eurocontrol.int/eadbasic/pamslig...-1_en_2013-01-10.pdf

The current western approach to Manston is 102 degrees, assuming the full heading was in use in 1944 and with a change of magnetic north of around 8 -10 degrees over about 70 years this would make some sort of sense of 112?

The magnetic variation was calculated using a Resources Canada tool but is based on entering a date and a lat and longtitude setting.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.053 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information