Do you have any idea what the chancel might have been used for ? Note the chimneys!
Also, I paid £10 for the ARG membership but its still not letting me access that link.
I would like to view some other drawings; What is the method of access? I didn't find the menu structure very obvious?
Half of it functioned as a chancel (the section nearest the gym where the congregation would be seated) and the other half is the RC chapel and vestry (of a standard length chancel). I can only surmise that the airfield had a larger than average RC congregation - hence it it is longer than standard.
You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!
The holes for the chimneys indicates that common solid fuel pot bellied stoves were in use. The increase length of the structure required more stoves but even then they would only have taken the chill off in cold weather. Nearer my God to thee, but frozen!
One more photo from a different angle.
Looking at the number of doors on the Chancel, I wonder if it was subdivided up.
I can believe that the altar was at the road end because there is a black and white tiled floor.
However, there is a brick Three sided base at the gym end, about 20ft from the intersection and which faces the gym. Its very sturdily built with reinforced mortar.
Could there have been a room here to act as a bar or refreshments area for when the gym was used for dances?
This message has an attachment image. Please log in or register to see it.
Ah five bays (I was not expecting that), it seems that the chancel is of the correct length, the first pic angle implied that it was longer but clearly not in this image. Second door on the right is the entrance to the vestry with an internal lobby, there will be a lateral wall there separating this section from the chancel.
You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!
Any idea how many of the chancels were orientated east/west with the alter at the eastern part of the building as is the convention with churches in Britain. ? The example at Alconbury appears to be aligned roughly east west, One of the examples you mention in your book, RAF Honnington is not on the east west alignment. Wonder if it was a case of if the chancel could be built with the traditional orientation it was if not then it was built to fit the available space?
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.