Enquiry, building type/use?

17 Oct 2016 19:08 - 18 Oct 2016 08:05 #1 by redmist
Enquiry, building type/use? was created by redmist
Hello gents, perhaps someone could enlighten me regarding these remains I came across whilst photographing some remains? (York, Clifton Moor). My initial guess is that the bulk of what I found represent an area of dispersed accommodation and/or admin buildings but not being a 'regular' on such sites this (to me) unusual and unexpected construction has got me scratching my head. It seems there was some kind of (building?) that had a series of pillars either inside it, or underneath it supporting a raised floor. But all that is speculation on my part. Hopefully the photos show enough to help identify the size and extent of the original construction. From memory the pillar fragment was at least 4 inches in diameter. Grid plan pattern of pillar bases. Over to you and thanks in advance for any input :-)

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.

York 054a

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.

York 056a

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.

York 057a

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.

York 061a

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2016 08:37 #2 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic Enquiry, building type/use?
I do not know the answer but I have seen something similar at Dunkeswell though they may not be the same:

Pairs of earthenware pots are spaced at seven ft centres and 6ft apart, are filled with concrete and support steel studs. The studs are not threaded along their entire length. NGR: ST 1361 0741

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!
The following user(s) said Thank You: redmist

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2016 09:50 #3 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic Enquiry, building type/use?

My initial guess is that the bulk of what I found represent an area of dispersed accommodation and/or admin buildings...

Where was this site, Redmist ?

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2016 14:44 #4 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Enquiry, building type/use?
I wonder if the supportsituation are to keep 5 floor of the ground to keep something dry or rodent free?

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2016 17:00 #5 by redmist
Replied by redmist on topic Enquiry, building type/use?
Thanks for the input so far.
Carnaby - I will add some more photos etc to the main airfield entry. They might help with specifics.
Peter Kirk - such a purpose did occur to me too, but on an RAF airfield site? I was rather hoping that these were a common known item and an answer would have been straight forthcoming, however it does make for a bit of interest. Although I suppose the area may have been subject to flood or general wet, but so many other adjacent building pads don't have these features. Including ones directly alongside. Now if this had been a Roman site ..... :-)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2016 17:13 #6 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Enquiry, building type/use?
That's it! An RAF hypocaust :)

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2016 22:20 #7 by PETERTHEEATER
Replied by PETERTHEEATER on topic Enquiry, building type/use?
It was usual to raise timber hutting off the ground.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2016 22:30 #8 by redmist
Replied by redmist on topic Enquiry, building type/use?
I had thought of that one too, but the surviving section of broken pillar was at least 3 feet high, maybe more? That seems quite extreme, unless there was a known flooding issue. York does have this problem these days. I don't have the local knowledge to answer whether it had it back then, but if this area was inundated to that kind of depth then the rest of the airfield would be one large swimming pool :-) But raised buildings do seem likely explanations.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.064 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information