I always used manual methods with drawing boards. CAD programs for the PC were never easy to use and would take much longer to do than by hand. As discussed many times on the forum Paint.NET seem to be the best for tracing existing palns or maps.
I think it's safe to say the quality of drawings in this book are not that good but then that wasn't really the point of the book. Besides it did give me an insight into the layouts of many the airfields not shown on maps or long gone. It also encouraged me to seek out better versions. It also sparked my interest in the changing layouts.
I wonder what my opinion would be if I bought it now for the first time?
No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)
Well the book confirms the site plan info that there where 4 T2's & a B1 at Desborough but looking at the hangar marked as a B1 on the record site plan it look more like a T2 to me so maybe the B1 was one of the 2 now missing.
I've found sketchup good for tracing an airfiled as you can zoom to it in google earth then take a snapshot of that view in sketchup.
English Civil War Re-enactor with the Sealed Knot.
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!
Peter and bucanneer - Off Topic but:
which CAD do you use. Decades ago I drew all my plans on IBM mainframe CADAM. I've failed to find a Windoze application which is as easy to use.
The company made me redundant with the provisor - until your official leaving date just turn up for work and amuse yourself. I spent six weeks drawing site plans. The day I left they presented me with a 1 inch computer tape-reel containing all my drawings. A year later I worked for another company with IBM mainframe. The tech guy said he could transfer all my drawings to DXF format which would work in a DOS environment. Unfortunately he failed as he couldn't read the tape. Turned out that if you don't use a tape-reel for a long while the data 'prints-through' from one layer to the adjacent ones and corrupts.
Graham
I use (still) DesignCAD. As model making is also a hobby, I initially used a programme ModelCAD then graduated to DesignCAD when I picked up an original programme in a PC store very cheap during a sale. I still use it although its unsupported because it's familiar and does everything I want despite some quirks.
I did try AutoCAD Light at one stage but it was just too feature heavy and a steep learning curve.
I sympathise with the loss of your 'on-tape' drawings. I think we have all had an experience of losing hours or even days or months of work through similar events. Even the backups we all keep now (don't we!) are still liable to loss for unforseen reasons.
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.