I have long been intrigued by the relationship, during WW2,between the late Sir Winston Churchill and Lord Louis Mountbatten. Churchill entrusted Mountbatten to manage the partition of India but was critical of the final outcome which did not follow his wishes.
The diaries and records of Mountbatten were purchased with public money and lodged with the archive of the University of Southampton (UoS) but kept unavailable to public access for reasons of sensitivity despite a legal obligation to do so. It's a long story and an Internet search will provide detail.
What has happened, very recently, is that the UoS has now released them for public access which requires registration with the Archivist:
Partly but it appears to have been the UoS Archivist who had read the contents recommending non-release due to what he considered to be sensitive information concerning the royal family. Driven by an individual, who spent a small fortune of his own money to force release of the papers, an order was made to do so yet the UoS did not do so until recently. Perhaps the 'delay' was due to cataloguing and digitisation.
I have 'bid' for access an await personal on-line Login details.
It tends to be claims of wanting access to private papers for academic reasons but in practice it is to write a book and usually make a TV programme so digging up a bit of scandal helps sales and so profits.
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.