That is why I have bought a lot of maps and charts from the forties that are now out of copyright, so I can copy them without charges, just quoted as "Authors Collection". The distinction between copyright and licence is blurred and often get confused. My suspicion is that copying copies that have been scanned by others, whether they be individuals or organisations, is the real issue. The copyright cannot be extended - or can it?
The rules were probably made by lawyers so they are bound to twist you in knots, even when you think you have understood it.
PS. I realise that buying maps and charts online is an expense but on average each one has cost me about £5.00, due to a number of bulk purchases, plus many have more than one location so offer a saving over the TNA £15 charge for each photo, even if it is of the same item.
How the heck do people publish aviation books with photos from IWM and RAFM and not make a loss?
No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)
Its not only IWM and RAFM, HE or what ever they call themselves today, also rip off and prevent 'amateur' research with their outrageous fees for aerial photography. I have complained twice now on their Linkedin site.
You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.