Interesting piece of research, REF. Many questions still remain unanswered, including some raised by subsequent posts.
First, the date of the official list (pp306-307 of Humphrey Wynn’s RAF Nuclear Deterrent Forces) cited in the opening post was February 1962 (not 1963). Furthermore, I think it is vital as a starting point that the official list is quoted without us adding any other aerodromes, however sure of our facts we may be. Shawbury and Tarrant Rushton do NOT appear. It may be significant that these airfields had runways of only 6,000 feet, whereas the others in the list were all larger. The fields at Aldergrove, Carnaby and Kemble, which seem to form a fourth category, likewise do not appear on the 1962 official list at all — we are mixing fact with supposition.
Marham is also NOT on the 1962 official list. At this time, its Valiants were assigned to SACEUR and were not part of the UK deterrent at all.
While Gaydon and Wyton are in the Class 1 division of the list with the other V-Bomber main bases, their resident squadrons or OCUs were not assigned to the bomber plan and the airfields would have been used for dispersal by other units. It is known officially that No 138’s Valiants from Wittering were assigned to Gaydon, Pershore and Middleton St George until September 1961, when they were changed to Filton and Yeovilton.
The 1962 list, itself, was of airfields “approved for” bomber ORPs. Thus, of course, much can happen between plan and execution. However, ‘do the math’: The list cited by Wynn gives 14 aerodromes (including nine Class 1s) with room for four; and 22 with room for two. Total exactly 100 — not a coincidence, I suspect.
On the point of the list’s fallibility, its mention of two ORPs at Leconfield is, plainly, wrong. To this day, Google Earth shows four; and I recall a day in the mid-1960s when four Waddington Vulcans landed and took up station there — incidentally, the only time the regular group of schoolboys at Crash Gate 1 received any harassment from the RAF Police.
The aerial photographic evidence for ORPs at Shawbury and Tarrant Rushton is now compelling. My original doubts are dispelled; perhaps it was established that V-Bombers could operate off 6,000 feet in wartime. That raises the question: If these two should be added to the list of dispersal fields, should any of the airfields supplying exactly 100 places on the 1962 list be deleted? Is that why some dispersals are proving difficult to find? Were some dispersal airfields used in the early days and then discontinued?
In the case of Carnaby, I admit having to enter ‘Victor Meldrew mode’. At the time, this housed three Thors and 32 Bloodhounds. Breighton was similar and Marham had Valiants and Bloodhounds, but nowhere else was there a plan to combine all three elements on one base.
I have a magnificent mental picture of four V-Bombers lifting majestically off the Carnaby runway while, a few hundred feet away, flame and smoke is belching from three Thors clawing their way vertically upwards, starting a similar journey to Moscow; and the occasional Bloodhound pops-off and streaks towards approaching ‘Bisons’ and ‘Bears’, its departure carefully timed in the gaps between the departing V-Bombers. Surely, the Carnaby plan can only have been an afterthought, following 1963 withdrawal of the missiles. Can anyone confirm that the ORP was built before the field closed in 1969? Certainly, while living in that part of East Yorkshire and being in the local spotters’ network, I never heard of a practice dispersal to Carnaby.
The inclusion of civil airfields might seem odd, as some have commented. None more so than Tarrant Rushton, where there was normally no security. (On 3 August 1965, my dad and I turned up, unannounced, at Flight Refuelling’s works there and asked for a look round the hangars — a request most splendidly granted, with access to all parts.)
Clearly, some extra, uniformed support for even a brief V-Bomber presence would have been required — at Tarrant and, probably, elsewhere. Where would this have come from: RAF Regiment or, even, Territorial Army? Regarding the inclusion of civil airfields on the list, this is not an insuperable problem as they might have then been owned/operated by the Ministry of Aviation (or whatever its current name) and been government property.