Wireless telegraphy (wt)

15 Jul 2010 06:02 #1 by PETERTHEEATER
Wireless telegraphy (wt) was created by PETERTHEEATER
Communication between airfield and aircraft grew with the technology of the day through the 1930's and during WW2.

Can anyone give me a synopsis of radio communications to include the use HF communications leading to VHF communications and some kind of dateline?

When did 'voice' communication supercede Morse? Was WT Morse and RT voice?

What sort of aerial arrays (just general) were used on the ground (airfield) for transmission (Tx) and reception (Rx) of HF and VHF comms. Were dedicated 'ground' Tx/Rx units used or aircraft sets?

The main reason for my questions is to get an understanding of when ground to air visual signals were superceded by radio communications.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Jul 2010 06:49 #2 by SNAFU
Replied by SNAFU on topic Wireless telegraphy (wt)
An excellent question this, and as a 'ham' one I had been planning to ask.

And just to add an extra question to this, without intending to hijack the thread..... I read that on the Dams raid Guy Gibson wanted to talk directly to the other pilots, which alledgedly had not been done before. So the Lancasters were fitted with VHF R/T radios from fighter aircraft.

And from this the book suggested that the technique of Master Bombers giving a running commentary to the bomb aimers during a raid was born.

Is this plausible, or just another urban myth springing out of the Dambusters rais ?

TIA, Snafu

If it moves, shout at it....if it doesn't, paint it !

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Jul 2010 08:55 #3 by PETERTHEEATER
Replied by PETERTHEEATER on topic Wireless telegraphy (wt)
Not directly related to my query but, I found this whilst surfing. Don't be put off by the title, there is a variety of interesting information in this guide.

Thanks to Micdrow of the Aircraft of World War Two - Warbirds Forum for the PDF:

www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/attachments/co...rators-info-file.pdf

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Jul 2010 09:37 #4 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic Wireless telegraphy (wt)
Excellent find. Peter

A lot of the equipment in this book was available on the surplus market in the late 1950s. In particular the SCR 211 Wavemeter - much prized by radio amateurs of the period.

Graham

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Jul 2010 12:29 #5 by Guest
Replied by Guest on topic Wireless telegraphy (wt)
Can one of you chaps copy the file to me please? Don't really want to join yet another forum.

(also a licensed amateur)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Jul 2010 14:00 #6 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic Wireless telegraphy (wt)

Was WT Morse and RT voice?

Yes. W/T was used certainly up to and during WWII. It's big advantage (only advantage?) was that it was robust in comparison with speech transmissions. A very weak Morse signal could be understood, whereas telephony would be completely illegible. Certainly all Lancasters etc were equipped with a Morse Key, and for D/F purposes (which was very important) it was all that was required. I guess the single-seat fighter was the Achilles Heel. Sending a signal from a key strapped to the pilot's leg couldn't be easy whilst flying the plane.

Regarding dates etc, I've wondered about this for a while. Will see what I can dig up.

(Tigger - pm me with email address. Joining that forum was a real pain as it involved Yahoo)

Graham

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Jul 2010 15:18 #7 by Jim Hope
Replied by Jim Hope on topic Wireless telegraphy (wt)
Just been looking at "the Battle of Britain Then and Now". According to them, fighters were equiped with the HF RT T/R9 sets, although its performance was poor due to lack of range and no of channels available in the set. By late 1939 a new VHF set the T/R 1133 was available and this gave an air-ground range of 120 miles at 20000ft and air-air range of 100 miles. A new and improved T/R 1143 was available by late summer of 1940. According to "Then and Now", Dowding ordered thatduring the Battle of France, all A/C were to use the old HF T/R9 sets so it wasnt until mid 1940 that VHF was used.
Ground equipment for HF was probably the transtmitter type SWB8 or T1509. These were both still in use at Watton up until Mar/Apr 1963 when the last of the Lincolns were taken out of service, and the HF site was emptied. I drove past it in the early 80's and it was still in use as it had a flagpole in front and the ensign was flying. Probably something to do with Eatsern Radar. As an aside the T1509 was still in use at Salalah in 1971. The VHF equipment was more than likely the R1392 which was also used the the VHF D/F CRDF, and the low power T1540 and higher power T1131. Afraid I cant remember the power O/Ps. I did look on the RAF Henlow Signals Museum site, and although they seem to have most of the ground equipment, the onlt photo was that of the T1131.

Hope this is of some interest

Jim

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Jul 2010 17:39 #8 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic Wireless telegraphy (wt)
Yes Peter WT is morse aka cw, and RT is voice. As for the use of WT by aircraft, well Nimrods used morse. And some of the oceanic ATCCs had and may still have a morse capability.

And the other AATCs on the site will know of the speechless procedure which uses morse.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Jul 2010 18:00 #9 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic Wireless telegraphy (wt)
Canberra are you refering to the Hawker Nimrod, a single-seat biplane fighter which first flew in 1930, because I think Peter is talking 1930s / 1940s

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 Jul 2010 06:46 #10 by PETERTHEEATER
Replied by PETERTHEEATER on topic Wireless telegraphy (wt)

Just been looking at "the Battle of Britain Then and Now". According to them, fighters were equiped with the HF RT T/R9 sets, although its performance was poor due to lack of range and no of channels available in the set. By late 1939 a new VHF set the T/R 1133 was available and this gave an air-ground range of 120 miles at 20000ft and air-air range of 100 miles. A new and improved T/R 1143 was available by late summer of 1940. According to "Then and Now", Dowding ordered thatduring the Battle of France, all A/C were to use the old HF T/R9 sets so it wasnt until mid 1940 that VHF was used.
Ground equipment for HF was probably the transtmitter type SWB8 or T1509. These were both still in use at Watton up until Mar/Apr 1963 when the last of the Lincolns were taken out of service, and the HF site was emptied. I drove past it in the early 80's and it was still in use as it had a flagpole in front and the ensign was flying. Probably something to do with Eatsern Radar. As an aside the T1509 was still in use at Salalah in 1971. The VHF equipment was more than likely the R1392 which was also used the the VHF D/F CRDF, and the low power T1540 and higher power T1131. Afraid I cant remember the power O/Ps. I did look on the RAF Henlow Signals Museum site, and although they seem to have most of the ground equipment, the onlt photo was that of the T1131.

Hope this is of some interest

Jim


Thanks Jim, having owned the references - to which you refer - since publication it shows how little I take in when reading and re-reading!

From that, VHF was in use (or available) much earlier than I thought and fitted predominently into fighter aircraft.

Does anyone have any idea of a typical aerial arrangement for the HF? Long wires between towers? Typical location?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.172 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information