Threat to ML407 - The Grace Spitfire

14 Jun 2014 15:45 #1 by DEANO3528
Threat to ML407 - The Grace Spitfire was created by DEANO3528
I wanted this to get as much visibility as possible hence my posting this here rather than in the relevant airfield section.

I find it unbelieveable that such a small minority can have such an effect on anything. The NIMBY element is not a nice one!

"It is with sad resignation that I inform you the Grace Spitfire will not be able to display at Rendlesham Show as a DIRECT result of Mike Sherwen’s Bentwaters Campaign Group together with Charlotte Morgan of Tunstall combined anti Air Leasing Ltd aviation activities. I despair that so few can have such an adverse affect on so many. I will not open the Show in the light of the foregoing."


If you haven't already, please write a brief email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. saying that you support the Bentwaters planning application. Please use C10/3239 as the emails subject. All it needs to say is "I am in favour of planning application C10/3239". Your email could make all the difference. Thank you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jun 2014 15:51 #2 by Alex Brown
Replied by Alex Brown on topic Threat to ML407 - The Grace Spitfire
I'm happy to add my support, however my own (reasonably in-depth) knowledge of the planning process is that the quality and not the quantity of letters of objection/support are what really matter?

Yes, I'm back(ish).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jun 2014 16:23 #3 by John Anderson
Replied by John Anderson on topic Threat to ML407 - The Grace Spitfire

I'm happy to add my support, however my own (reasonably in-depth) knowledge of the planning process is that the quality and not the quantity of letters of objection/support are what really matter?


Agree Alex-in my experience individual objections rather than adding a name to a list carries more weight with a planning committee.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jun 2014 20:26 #4 by Osgood
Replied by Osgood on topic Threat to ML407 - The Grace Spitfire
My experience of county level planning issues suggests that lists of names carry little weight - individual letters (of support or objection) are far more important.

Duplicated letters are of little use, they must be seen to be individual representations.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jun 2014 22:24 #5 by DEANO3528
Replied by DEANO3528 on topic Threat to ML407 - The Grace Spitfire
I didn't suggest adding a name to a list or a petition.
My experience with CC's, with regard to laning issues has proved that quantity can help. Lists don't work as most CC's take a petition of 300 signatures from The XYZ Club as one single for or against. Democracy at it's best!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Jun 2014 06:08 #6 by corij
Replied by corij on topic Threat to ML407 - The Grace Spitfire
might be worth writing personally to the head of planning at Suffolk coastal , peter ridley . i got to know him years ago when he worked for quite a long time inside a shed/portacabin on Parham Airfield . theres a chance he is interested in the old plane thing and certainly has influence now .

aed lort

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Jun 2014 21:40 #7 by Alex Brown
Replied by Alex Brown on topic Threat to ML407 - The Grace Spitfire
Added some info about this to the Bentwaters thread - the Parish Council are very much behind the Application, and are looking for letters of support as described above by Deano.

It seems that there has been a level of misinformation spread about the application by certain people who have a rather baffling impression that the plans are for a busy commercial airport, which is simply not true...
/community/showthread.php?2020-Bentwaters&p=146800#post146800

Yes, I'm back(ish).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.044 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information